hedgiewan: (Default)
hedgiewan ([personal profile] hedgiewan) wrote2008-10-08 12:40 am

please sign the petition for the protection of practical pockets.

I bought these very nice chinos. They are lovely and grey and long enough (thank you jcrew). Too bad the back pockets are only as deep as a credit card is tall. No, not wide, tall. Yeah, they put in two back pockets, but only made them two and a half inches deep.

WHO DOES THAT?!

the hedge abides.

WHO DOES THAT?!

[identity profile] vorrant.livejournal.com 2008-10-08 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
Someone who has never read a book, EVER.

Re: WHO DOES THAT?!

[identity profile] hedgiewan.livejournal.com 2008-10-08 10:45 pm (UTC)(link)
well, the pockets in women's pants are never ever big enough to put a paperback in. but i'd be consoled if i could at least fit my WALLET in my pocket. or, hey, at least my bus card.

[identity profile] typhoid.livejournal.com 2008-10-08 10:46 am (UTC)(link)
Seriously.

I bought a bunch of nice black pants for work from Target, and just tried them on to make sure they fit. When I wore them the first time I found out the back pockets are just like that, and there are NO front pockets. I have to put my wallet in SIDEWAYS in the back.

What the FUCK?

[identity profile] monstersocks.livejournal.com 2008-10-08 11:20 am (UTC)(link)
Pockets in women's pants are LAME. Apparently clothing designers think women never want to keep anything in their pockets or put their hands in their pockets.

[identity profile] mousezilla.livejournal.com 2008-10-08 11:44 am (UTC)(link)
Silly Hedgie, all girls carry purses like a proper lady should, which we can hand off to our pack mul... husbands! Whatever would we need pockets for?

Yeah, I totally feel you on this. I pretty much gave up and started carrying a purse after I realized the only girl pants that had sufficient pockets anymore are being sold at Hot Topic for $55.

But it's a really BUTCH purse! Wiv skulls and studs and stuff!